Entrapment  ?

Case 2011cf3855

Has A.D.A. Megan Williamson already lost a case against an attorney in possession of an alleged silencer?

After many filings and objections by the Milwaukee District Attorney’s Office, oral arguments were heard in court.  Judge Watts ruled that an entrapment defense could be used in trial. 

This case before the court involved a MPD sting operation, two firearms, an alleged silencer, and an ex confidential informant.

The ex confidential informant in this case is Michael Bond (a convicted felon). Michael Bond was released under probation to engage in sting operations. Michael Bond’s sentencing and freedom to roam the streets was contingent upon bringing citizens into sting operations.

Michael Bond’s sentencing status was being measured by the success of the sting operations.  In essence, Michael Bond was working on commission, the more stings he brought in, the less his prison sentence.

On August 12^th. 2011 During a MPD sting operation, Michael Bond brought onto private property two guns and alleged silencer to sell. The scene was Mayfair Mall.  Mayfair Mall is a posted “no firearms” property.

The fact that the property was posted “no firearms” didn’t matter to Dean Newport or any of the other officers involved in the placing of the sting on posted Mayfair Mall property.

Bond was working this sting operation under the guidance and control of MPD Detective Dean Newport.

Dean Newport was using information gathered by two confidential informants to build a sting.

Michael Bond was one of the confidential informants, the other an often homeless man who has mental issues.

Neither informant had any knowledge or evidence of illegal activity of the victim of the sting. Only hearsay.

Without knowledge or evidence of criminal activity and acting only on hearsay, Dean Newport had Michael Bond pursue the victim.

Does this sound like Dean Newport took methods of operation lessons from the ATF? The ATF is known to use and abuse the mentally impaired.

During the time of the sting operation, guidance and control of Michael Bond was negligent at best.

Remember, Michael Bond was a felon released on bond. During this time of sting operations, Michael Bond was living in a foreclosed house. This house was not listed on his probation terms.  This was in direct violation of terms of his bond. Who was watching this criminal?

Michael Bond was violating his parole, became a squatter in a foreclosed house all while under the direction and control of Dean Newport.  How could Detective Newport not know?

Michael Bond as a squatter in the foreclosed house also engaged in court action against the lender of the house. Bond filed false documents into court records that were so egregious that a federal judge notified Michael Bond’s parole agent of the digressions of Michael Bond’s probation.

Michael Bond was court ordered to now wear a bracelet, and the bracelet wasn't bling! Was the overseeing of Michael Bond by Dean Newport and the parole officer during this time negligent?   YES

Back to Dean:

Dean Newport during this time was working with the Milwaukee ATF.  The Milwaukee ATF at this time also had ongoing sting operations in the city.

The Milwaukee ATF had opened Fearless Distributing, an east side sting operation selling counterfeit clothes, drug paraphernalia and also purchasing guns. During this time,

The ATF was also recruiting, using and abusing the mentally challenged.  Dean Newport used his many contacts with the ATF. Dean Newport secured weapons and an alleged silencer from the ATF for his own sting operations, including the Mayfair Mall sting.

Dean Newport was part of a multi government task force involved in street crimes, drugs and guns. A busy guy by most accounts.

Perhaps Dean was too busy to properly focus his attention on a rogue informant that reestablished his drug running and pimping all while under probation and supervision. Perhaps too busy to pay attention to details to ensure the confidential informant was playing by the rules

Well anyway, during court recess we heard discussions between defense witnesses and Dean Newport. During this recess.We heard Dean Newport calling both Michael Bond and the other confidential informant liars.

Where can this case possibly go when Dean Newport during court recess called two of his informant’s and witnesses liars?

Worse yet, how can one sign an affidavit attesting to the reliability of an informant to secure a search warrant from a judge when you know they are liars?

The trial might be all about the felon Michael Bond on the stand impeaching himself.

To an experienced trial lawyer like Jeff Jensen, will

Michael Bond tell the rest of the story?

Will Megan Williamson really produce Michael Bond for trial?  Will Edward Flynn acknowledge an affair with a MPD captain?  Will John Chisholm ever put country before party?  Inquiring minds want to know.

In our humble opinion, A.D.A. Megan Williamson and Dean Newport have wasted valuable resources on an entrapped victim who was and never has been a threat to society.

Fact is you can fill out an application to legally own  a silencer for  $200 dollars .  Talk to us readers!

If you plan to attend the trial, you may wish to bring a bottle of 409