Illuminating Hidden Truths

The case of an alleged silencer in possession by an attorney is fast becoming in court an intellectual debate between a defense attorney and a judge, all while leaving the prosecutor behind to muddle her way through her pleadings. 

When questioned by the court during court hearings on Dec. 23rd., Assistant District Attorney Megan Williamson was more than hesitant to declare to the court that her Chief in case witness would be Michael Bond or that she would absolutely subpoena Michael Bond to trial as a witness.  

(ADA Williamson has been elusive to directly answer to the court about the participation of Michael Bond during trial, and for good reason.  Michael Bond has a history of lying and filing false statements to authorities.  Michael Bond has the potential on the stand to become the prosecutors worst nightmare during impeachment proceedings with an experienced trial lawyer as Jeffrey Jensen). 

Much of Megan Williamson’s court pleadings on the 23rd. were about the practices of a private investigator who served a subpoena to then MPD and ATF confidential informant Michael Bond.

Michael Bond had been working for “credits” to keep his street freedom and to further reduce his future prison time.

Megan Williamson has repeatedly pleaded to the court that the private investigator represented himself as a “gun dealer” to serve Michael Bond a subpoena.   Megan Williamson so far has not brought forth any evidence to the court in support of her claims.

During previous pleadings to the court, Megan Williamson stated she did not plan on introducing any evidence of the guns seized at the home of the defendant Tom Barrett.  According to Officer Dean Newport and MPD,   there were no illegal guns found or seized during the raid on Tom Barrett’s home.

Defense attorney Jeffrey Jensen has used preliminary motions to test the waters in judge Watts court, this defense inspires dialogue between the two before actual pleadings occur in the court 

Defense Attorney Jeffrey Jensen did made it very clear during court proceedings that an entrapment defense was going to be in play. Michael Bond would be called in trial as an adverse witness,   and would be impeached about acts of inducement by Michael Bond as part of defense.

During further court proceedings, Attorney Jensen was very coy in the specifics of all defenses, refusing to tip his hand in other strategies that will be used during trial.

MCC has not seen any corrections to court records regarding the false pleadings  in court of Megan Williamson.  Therefore another week goes by that Megan Williamson remains in violation of SCR20:3,3

Finally, MCC was informed that Megan Williamson had threatened the private investigator with arrest if he testified.

A strange threat by a prosecutor, because a person who serves a subpoena is acting on behalf of the court, even stranger, because of the threat of arrest, is the possibility of the claim of witness intimidation by the prosecutor.

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Illuminating hidden truths  

As trial nears for ADA  Megan Williamson's case of a citizen in possession of an alleged silencer,  the concerns of using a convicted drug felon as a witness should be mounting in Ms. Williamson's mind..

This trial will contain many first's for Ms. Williamson.  Among the first's of Ms. Williamson's concerns will be the witnesses Michael Bond.

Mr. Bond was originally a confidential informant used by both the ATF and MPD.  

Megan Williamson exposed the confidentiality of Michael Bond during court proceedings..

Michael Bond is a well documented liar according to court records.
Michael Bond was also a felon in possession of weapons that was supplied by Edward Flynn's MPD and the ATF.

Michael Bond's bond was revised do to his documented digressions of being in violation of bond, including living at another residence in direct violation of court orders.

The incompetence of government officials mishandling Mr. Bond and further lack of oversight of Michael Bond by MPD and the ATF is well documented.

If fact,  the oversight was so negligent that a federal court judge had to notify local authorities of his violations of bond.

Folks, I don't make this shit up, it's all public record. 

The second concern is going to be the impeachment of Mr. Bond's testimony.   It should be quite entertaining to watch Mr. Bond further impeach himself during court testimony. 

With Michael Bond, you can't fix stupid !

The third concern is going to be the impeachment of Ms. Williamson's veracity to the court during court pleadings.

It is well documented that Ms. Williamson pleaded falsely to the court on 9-9-2013 violating SCR20:3,3.   

MCC notified Ms. Williamson of her false pleadings to the court via email on Nov 22, 2013.   Ms Williamson has continued to allow the misinformation to stand before the court further violating SCR20:3,3.

On 9-9-2013 in court pleadings, ADA Williamson told the court there was no E-trace done on guns seized from Mr. Barrett's home.
The facts are E-trace was performed days shortly after the confiscation of the guns.  In fact, nothing was found on any guns to substantiate any of the lies by ex MPD's confidential informants.

MPD undercover cop Dean Newport confirmed directly to MCC that E-trace was performed days after the raid and no illegal guns were found.  

Dean Newport's face became most perplexed as Dean read the 9-9-2013 transcript pleadings of ADA Williamson. 
Dean stated he went thru all the evidence with ADA Williamson months before, including covering E-Trace during a 4 hour meeting.

It looks like Judge Watts has many prosecution issues to deal with in the next court date of Dec.23rd.,  including withholding of exculpatory evidence and the possibility of Ms. Williamson being called to the stand.

Monday is Showtime !